2015-11-28 01:16:48 +11:00
|
|
|
# Contributing to sway
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributing just involves sending a pull request. You will probably be more
|
2018-10-07 01:52:17 +10:00
|
|
|
successful with your contribution if you visit
|
|
|
|
[#sway-devel](https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=sway-devel) on
|
|
|
|
irc.freenode.net upfront and discuss your plans.
|
2015-11-28 01:16:48 +11:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-07 01:52:17 +10:00
|
|
|
Note: rules are made to be broken. Adjust or ignore any/all of these as you see
|
|
|
|
fit, but be prepared to justify it to your peers.
|
2016-09-06 02:09:21 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2021-01-05 01:15:43 +11:00
|
|
|
## Scope of future changes to sway
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Important**: Sway has completed its core value proposition: it is a fully
|
|
|
|
featured Wayland-compatible replacement for i3. It is not our intention to
|
|
|
|
expand on the scope of what i3 aims to accomplish. Our priorities now are
|
|
|
|
increasing the stability, reliability, and performance of sway within its
|
|
|
|
current scope. For this reason, most new window management feature requests are
|
|
|
|
not accepted, even if accompanied by a patch.
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-28 04:23:04 +11:00
|
|
|
## Pull Requests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you already have your own pull request habits, feel free to use them. If you
|
|
|
|
don't, however, allow me to make a suggestion: feature branches pulled from
|
|
|
|
upstream. Try this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Fork sway
|
2018-10-07 01:52:17 +10:00
|
|
|
2. `git clone https://github.com/username/sway && cd sway`
|
|
|
|
3. `git remote add upstream https://github.com/swaywm/sway`
|
2015-11-28 04:23:04 +11:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You only need to do this once. You're never going to use your fork's master
|
|
|
|
branch. Instead, when you start working on a feature, do this:
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-07 01:52:17 +10:00
|
|
|
1. `git fetch upstream`
|
|
|
|
2. `git checkout -b add-so-and-so-feature upstream/master`
|
|
|
|
3. Add and commit your changes
|
|
|
|
4. `git push -u origin add-so-and-so-feature`
|
|
|
|
5. Make a pull request from your feature branch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you submit your pull request, your commit log should do most of the talking
|
|
|
|
when it comes to describing your changes and their motivation. In addition to
|
|
|
|
this, your pull request's comments will ideally include a test plan that the
|
|
|
|
reviewers can use to (1) demonstrate the problem on master, if applicable and
|
|
|
|
(2) verify that the problem no longer exists with your changes applied (or that
|
|
|
|
your new features work correctly). Document all of the edge cases you're aware
|
|
|
|
of so we can adequately test them - then verify the test plan yourself before
|
|
|
|
submitting.
|
2015-11-28 04:23:04 +11:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-28 21:47:44 +10:00
|
|
|
## Commit Messages
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please strive to write good commit messages. Here's some guidelines to follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first line should be limited to 50 characters and should be a sentence that
|
2018-10-07 01:52:17 +10:00
|
|
|
completes the thought [When applied, this commit will...] *"Implement
|
|
|
|
cmd_move"* or *"Fix #742"* or *"Improve performance of arrange_windows on ARM"*
|
|
|
|
or similar.
|
2016-07-28 21:47:44 +10:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-07 01:52:17 +10:00
|
|
|
The subsequent lines should be separated from the subject line by a single
|
2016-07-28 21:47:44 +10:00
|
|
|
blank line, and include optional details. In this you can give justification
|
|
|
|
for the change, [reference Github
|
|
|
|
issues](https://help.github.com/articles/closing-issues-via-commit-messages/),
|
|
|
|
or explain some of the subtler details of your patch. This is important because
|
|
|
|
when someone finds a line of code they don't understand later, they can use the
|
|
|
|
`git blame` command to find out what the author was thinking when they wrote
|
2018-10-07 01:52:17 +10:00
|
|
|
it. It's also easier to review your pull requests if they're separated into
|
2016-07-28 21:47:44 +10:00
|
|
|
logical commits that have good commit messages and justify themselves in the
|
|
|
|
extended commit description.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a good rule of thumb, anything you might put into the pull request
|
|
|
|
description on Github is probably fair game for going into the extended commit
|
|
|
|
message as well.
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-07 01:52:17 +10:00
|
|
|
See [here](https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/) for more details.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Code Review
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When your changes are submitted for review, one or more core committers will
|
|
|
|
look over them. Smaller changes might be merged with little fanfare, but larger
|
|
|
|
changes will typically see review from several people. Be prepared to receive
|
|
|
|
some feedback - you may be asked to make changes to your work. Our code review
|
|
|
|
process is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. **Triage** the pull request. Do the commit messages make sense? Is a test
|
|
|
|
plan necessary and/or present? Add anyone as reviewers that you think should
|
|
|
|
be there (using the relevant GitHub feature, if you have the permissions, or
|
|
|
|
with an @mention if necessary).
|
|
|
|
2. **Review** the code. Look for code style violations, naming convention
|
|
|
|
violations, buffer overflows, memory leaks, logic errors, non-portable code
|
|
|
|
(including GNU-isms), etc. For significant changes to the public API, loop in
|
|
|
|
a couple more people for discussion.
|
|
|
|
3. **Execute** the test plan, if present.
|
|
|
|
4. **Merge** the pull request when all reviewers approve.
|
|
|
|
5. **File** follow-up tickets if appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Style Reference
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sway is written in C with a style similar to the [kernel
|
|
|
|
style](https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst), but
|
|
|
|
with a few notable differences.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Try to keep your code conforming to C11 and POSIX as much as possible, and do
|
|
|
|
not use GNU extensions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Brackets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brackets always go on the same line, including in functions.
|
|
|
|
Always include brackets for if/while/for, even if it's a single statement.
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
void function(void) {
|
|
|
|
if (condition1) {
|
|
|
|
do_thing1();
|
2015-11-28 01:18:46 +11:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-07 01:52:17 +10:00
|
|
|
if (condition2) {
|
|
|
|
do_thing2();
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
do_thing3();
|
2015-11-28 01:18:46 +11:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-10-07 01:52:17 +10:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Indentation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indentations are a single tab.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For long lines that need to be broken, the continuation line should be indented
|
|
|
|
with an additional tab.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the line being broken is opening a new block (functions, if, while, etc.),
|
|
|
|
the continuation line should be indented with two tabs, so they can't be
|
|
|
|
misread as being part of the block.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
really_long_function(argument1, argument2, ...,
|
|
|
|
argument3, argument4);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (condition1 && condition2 && ...
|
|
|
|
condition3 && condition4) {
|
|
|
|
do_thing();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Try to break the line in the place which you think is the most appropriate to
|
|
|
|
balance the lines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Line Length
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-15 05:20:27 +11:00
|
|
|
Try to keep your lines under 80 columns, assuming a tab width equal to 4 spaces,
|
|
|
|
but you can go up to 100 if it improves readability. Don't break lines
|
|
|
|
indiscriminately, try to find nice breaking points so your code is easy to read.
|
2018-10-07 01:52:17 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Names
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global function and type names should be prefixed with `sway_submodule_` (e.g.
|
|
|
|
`struct sway_output`, `sway_output_destroy`). For static functions and
|
|
|
|
types local to a file, the names chosen aren't as important. Static functions
|
|
|
|
shouldn't have a `sway_` prefix.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For include guards, use the header's filename relative to include. Uppercase
|
|
|
|
all of the characters, and replace any invalid characters with an underscore.
|
2015-11-28 01:18:46 +11:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-07 01:52:17 +10:00
|
|
|
### Construction/Destruction Functions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For functions that are responsible for constructing and destructing an object,
|
|
|
|
they should be written as a pair of one of two forms:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* `init`/`finish`: These initialize/deinitialize a type, but are **NOT**
|
|
|
|
responsible for allocating it. They should accept a pointer to some
|
|
|
|
pre-allocated memory (e.g. a member of a struct).
|
|
|
|
* `create`/`destroy`: These also initialize/deinitialize, but will return a
|
|
|
|
pointer to a `malloc`ed chunk of memory, and will `free` it in `destroy`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A destruction function should always be able to accept a NULL pointer or a
|
|
|
|
zeroed value and exit cleanly; this simplifies error handling a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Error Codes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For functions not returning a value, they should return a (stdbool.h) bool to
|
|
|
|
indicated if they succeeded or not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Macros
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keep the use of macros to a minimum, especially if a function can do the job. If
|
|
|
|
you do need to use them, try to keep them close to where they're being used and
|
|
|
|
`#undef` them after.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
struct wlr_backend *wlr_backend_autocreate(struct wl_display *display) {
|
|
|
|
struct wlr_backend *backend;
|
|
|
|
if (getenv("WAYLAND_DISPLAY") || getenv("_WAYLAND_DISPLAY")) {
|
|
|
|
backend = attempt_wl_backend(display);
|
|
|
|
if (backend) {
|
|
|
|
return backend;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-11-28 01:18:46 +11:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-10-07 01:52:17 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const char *x11_display = getenv("DISPLAY");
|
|
|
|
if (x11_display) {
|
|
|
|
return wlr_x11_backend_create(display, x11_display);
|
2015-11-28 01:18:46 +11:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-07 01:52:17 +10:00
|
|
|
// Attempt DRM+libinput
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct wlr_session *session = wlr_session_create(display);
|
|
|
|
if (!session) {
|
|
|
|
wlr_log(WLR_ERROR, "Failed to start a DRM session");
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int gpu = wlr_session_find_gpu(session);
|
|
|
|
if (gpu == -1) {
|
|
|
|
wlr_log(WLR_ERROR, "Failed to open DRM device");
|
|
|
|
goto error_session;
|
2015-11-28 01:18:46 +11:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-07 01:52:17 +10:00
|
|
|
backend = wlr_multi_backend_create(session);
|
|
|
|
if (!backend) {
|
|
|
|
goto error_gpu;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-11-28 01:18:46 +11:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-07 01:52:17 +10:00
|
|
|
struct wlr_backend *libinput = wlr_libinput_backend_create(display, session);
|
|
|
|
if (!libinput) {
|
|
|
|
goto error_multi;
|
2015-11-28 01:18:46 +11:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-10-07 01:52:17 +10:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct wlr_backend *drm = wlr_drm_backend_create(display, session, gpu);
|
|
|
|
if (!drm) {
|
|
|
|
goto error_libinput;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wlr_multi_backend_add(backend, libinput);
|
|
|
|
wlr_multi_backend_add(backend, drm);
|
|
|
|
return backend;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
error_libinput:
|
|
|
|
wlr_backend_destroy(libinput);
|
|
|
|
error_multi:
|
|
|
|
wlr_backend_destroy(backend);
|
|
|
|
error_gpu:
|
|
|
|
wlr_session_close_file(session, gpu);
|
|
|
|
error_session:
|
|
|
|
wlr_session_destroy(session);
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
2015-11-28 01:16:48 +11:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|