output: remove surface buffer damage check
A surface can have effective damage even without any buffer damage committed.
This commit is contained in:
parent
b518b1295c
commit
03a29ed36d
|
@ -633,21 +633,19 @@ static void damage_surface_iterator(struct sway_output *output,
|
|||
struct wlr_box box = *_box;
|
||||
scale_box(&box, output->wlr_output->scale);
|
||||
|
||||
if (pixman_region32_not_empty(&surface->buffer_damage)) {
|
||||
pixman_region32_t damage;
|
||||
pixman_region32_init(&damage);
|
||||
wlr_surface_get_effective_damage(surface, &damage);
|
||||
wlr_region_scale(&damage, &damage, output->wlr_output->scale);
|
||||
if (ceil(output->wlr_output->scale) > surface->current.scale) {
|
||||
// When scaling up a surface, it'll become blurry so we need to
|
||||
// expand the damage region
|
||||
wlr_region_expand(&damage, &damage,
|
||||
ceil(output->wlr_output->scale) - surface->current.scale);
|
||||
}
|
||||
pixman_region32_translate(&damage, box.x, box.y);
|
||||
wlr_output_damage_add(output->damage, &damage);
|
||||
pixman_region32_fini(&damage);
|
||||
pixman_region32_t damage;
|
||||
pixman_region32_init(&damage);
|
||||
wlr_surface_get_effective_damage(surface, &damage);
|
||||
wlr_region_scale(&damage, &damage, output->wlr_output->scale);
|
||||
if (ceil(output->wlr_output->scale) > surface->current.scale) {
|
||||
// When scaling up a surface, it'll become blurry so we need to
|
||||
// expand the damage region
|
||||
wlr_region_expand(&damage, &damage,
|
||||
ceil(output->wlr_output->scale) - surface->current.scale);
|
||||
}
|
||||
pixman_region32_translate(&damage, box.x, box.y);
|
||||
wlr_output_damage_add(output->damage, &damage);
|
||||
pixman_region32_fini(&damage);
|
||||
|
||||
if (whole) {
|
||||
wlr_output_damage_add_box(output->damage, &box);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue