transaction: Improve transaction commentary
Some comments where slightly misleading.
This commit is contained in:
parent
645cf76f8a
commit
7670f1a521
|
@ -341,8 +341,8 @@ static void transaction_progress_queue(void) {
|
|||
if (!server.transactions->length) {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// There's only ever one committed transaction,
|
||||
// and it's the first one in the queue.
|
||||
// Only the first transaction in the queue is committed, so that's the one
|
||||
// we try to process.
|
||||
struct sway_transaction *transaction = server.transactions->items[0];
|
||||
if (transaction->num_waiting) {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
@ -351,7 +351,8 @@ static void transaction_progress_queue(void) {
|
|||
transaction_destroy(transaction);
|
||||
list_del(server.transactions, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!server.transactions->length) {
|
||||
if (server.transactions->length == 0) {
|
||||
// The transaction queue is empty, so we're done.
|
||||
sway_idle_inhibit_v1_check_active(server.idle_inhibit_manager_v1);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -369,6 +370,7 @@ static void transaction_progress_queue(void) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// We again commit the first transaction in the queue to process it.
|
||||
transaction = server.transactions->items[0];
|
||||
transaction_commit(transaction);
|
||||
transaction_progress_queue();
|
||||
|
@ -533,8 +535,7 @@ void transaction_commit_dirty(void) {
|
|||
|
||||
list_add(server.transactions, transaction);
|
||||
|
||||
// There's only ever one committed transaction,
|
||||
// and it's the first one in the queue.
|
||||
// We only commit the first transaction added to the queue.
|
||||
if (server.transactions->length == 1) {
|
||||
transaction_commit(transaction);
|
||||
// Attempting to progress the queue here is useful
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue