When there are outputs with mixed scales, it was possible for swaybar to
alter `block->separator_block_width` for an output with a higher scale,
and use the changed value for a lower scale output. This caused there to
be larger than normal separation between blocks on the lower scale
outputs. The issue is more obvious the larger the scale difference
between the highest scale output and the lowest scale output.
This fixes the issue by using a local variable that is originally set to
`block->separator_block_width` for rendering, but if it needs to be
increased, the local variable is the only thing touched.
When `block->urgent` is set, use the urgent colors. This matches i3bar's
behavior. Previously, swaybar just ignored the property.
This also adds in rendering for right borders, which was missing.
Adds the bar subcommand `gaps <amount>|<horizontal> <vertical>|<top>
<right> <bottom> <left>` to set gaps for swaybar. Due to restrictions on
margins for a layer_surface, only the sides that are anchored to an edge
of the screen can have gaps. Since there is support for per-side outer
gaps for workspaces, those should be able to be used instead for the
last side.
The positions "left" and "right" are not allowed by the man page, remove them
from the allowed positions. Also print an error to stderr if we default to the
bottom position.
Fixes#2878
* The loop functions are now prefixed with `loop_`.
* It is now easy to add timers to the loop.
* Timers are implemented using pollfd and timerfd, rather than manually
checking them when any other event happens to arrive.
Previously, when the bar was hidden, the height would be set to 0.
This meant that if the bar was empty upon reshow, it would not render
since the height was still 0, which made it seem there was a problem.
Now, the height is not reset, but the width is, to indicate upon reshow
that the layer surface needed reconfiguring.
Since wayland does not currently allow swaybar to create global
keybinds, this is handled within sway and sent to the bar using a custom
event, so as not to pollute existing events, called bar_state_update.
As well as adding the hidden_state property to the bar config struct,
this commit handles barconfig_update events when the mode or
hidden_state changes, and uses a new function determine_bar_visibility
to hide or show the bar as required, using, respectively,
destroy_layer_surface, which is also newly added, and add_layer_surface,
which has been changed to allow dynamically adding the surface.
The received json is handled outside of the case statement, which will
allow better extensibility.
This commit also introduces the variable bar_is_dirty, the return value
signifying whether the bar requires rendering.
This distinguishes the binding mode from the distinct config mode, as
well as removing mode_pango_markup from the config struct where it
should not be present.
When running swaymsg -v, the version returned is actually the version of
swaymsg itself, yet the message displayed was "sway version <version>".
This can create confusion if users update sway and swaymsg but don't
restart sway, then use swaymsg to check the version.
This patch changes the wording to be "swaymsg version <version>"
instead, and likewise for swaybar.
To get the version of a running sway instance, users should run swaymsg
-t get_version.
Sway sets a default status_command which runs date every second. This
patch removes this behaviour so the user can have a NULL status bar if
desired.
I had to swap swaybar's event_loop_poll and wl_display_flush so that it
would map the initial surface.
It's better to use DT_RPATH dynamic section of the elf binary to store
the paths of libraries to load instead of overwriting LD_LIBRARY_PATH
for the whole environment, causing surprises. This solution is much more
transparent and perfectly suitable for running contained installations
of wayland/wlroots/sway.
The code unsetting the LD_LIBRARY_PATH/LD_PRELOAD was also deleted as
it's a placebo security at best - we should trust the execution path
that leads us to running sway, and it's way too late to care about those
variables since we already started executing our compositor, thus we
would be compromised anyway.
