Go to file
Chad Brokaw 2e8781fbb6 Remove piet API & replace w/ fragments
Removes the dependency on the piet crate and replaces all uses with the scene crate.  Also does some cleanup of the scene API, renaming some types and moving them all to the crate root for better ergonomics.
2022-08-11 15:29:15 -04:00
.github Add ref_name to commit message 2022-07-14 07:25:18 -07:00
doc Doc improvements 2022-07-13 12:07:55 -07:00
pgpu-render Remove piet API & replace w/ fragments 2022-08-11 15:29:15 -04:00
piet-gpu Remove piet API & replace w/ fragments 2022-08-11 15:29:15 -04:00
piet-gpu-derive Warning cleanup 2021-10-23 09:21:19 -07:00
piet-gpu-hal Expose path rendering in C API 2022-08-08 01:03:27 -04:00
piet-gpu-types Rebase on radial branch 2022-04-11 05:30:08 -04:00
piet-scene Remove piet API & replace w/ fragments 2022-08-11 15:29:15 -04:00
tests Remove piet API & replace w/ fragments 2022-08-11 15:29:15 -04:00
.gitattributes Tweak linguist settings 2021-12-08 12:49:40 -08:00
.gitignore fix formatting 2022-07-14 15:08:18 -04:00
Cargo.lock Remove piet API & replace w/ fragments 2022-08-11 15:29:15 -04:00
Cargo.toml Make pgpu-render compile on non apple platforms 2022-06-25 14:11:13 +01:00
LICENSE-APACHE Licenses and README 2020-04-15 08:56:39 -07:00
LICENSE-MIT Licenses and README 2020-04-15 08:56:39 -07:00
README.md Doc improvements 2022-07-13 12:07:55 -07:00

piet-gpu

This repo contains the new prototype for a new compute-centric 2D GPU renderer.

It succeeds the previous prototype, piet-metal.

Goals

The main goal is to answer research questions about the future of 2D rendering:

  • Is a compute-centered approach better than rasterization (Direct2D)? How much so?

  • To what extent do "advanced" GPU features (subgroups, descriptor arrays) help?

  • Can we improve quality and extend the imaging model in useful ways?

Another goal is to explore a standards-based, portable approach to GPU compute.

Blogs and other writing

Much of the research progress on piet-gpu is documented in blog entries. See doc/blogs.md for pointers to those.

There is a much larger and detailed vision that explains the longer-term goals of the project, and how we might get there.

Why not gfx-hal?

It makes a lot of sense to use gfx-hal, as it addresses the ability to write kernel and runtime code once and run it portably. But in exploring it I've found some points of friction, especially in using more "advanced" features. To serve the research goals, I'm enjoying using Vulkan directly, through ash, which I've found does a good job tracking Vulkan releases. One example is experimenting with VK_EXT_subgroup_size_control.

The hal layer in this repo is strongly inspired by gfx-hal, but with some differences. One is that we're shooting for a compile-time pipeline to generate GPU IR on DX12 and Metal, while gfx-hal ships SPIRV-Cross in the runtime. To access Shader Model 6, that would also require bundling DXC at runtime, which is not yet implemented (though it's certainly possible).

Why not wgpu?

The case for wgpu is also strong, but it's even less mature. I'd love to see it become a solid foundation, at which point I'd use it as the main integration with Druid.

In short, the goal is to facilitate the research now, collect the data, and then use that to choose a best path for shipping later.

License and contributions.

The piet-gpu project is dual-licensed under both Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses.

In addition, the shaders are provided under the terms of the Unlicense. The intent is for this research to be used in as broad a context as possible.

The dx12 backend was adapted from piet-dx12 by Brian Merchant.

Contributions are welcome by pull request. The Rust code of conduct applies. Pull requests should be against the dev branch; see shader_compilation.md for explanation and details.